Is blogging journalism?
I co-oped at a newspaper during high school. During an interview with a 103 year old man, my editor asked the man what the key to a happy, healthy, and long life was. The man leaned in closer towards me, like he was about to tell me a great secret, or give me one of those moments in life you never forget (he succeeded!). I was seventeen. He gripped his cane a little tighter. I got a good look at his brown, kind eyes, his droopy skin, and the thick prescription of his glasses. He looked at me and slowly said, “good food and good love”. He then winked, and leaned back into his worn-out chair. I noticed the “sepia” coloured picture of his wife on his nightstand. Because he said this to me, does this mean I’m an expert on life? When I drive, I sing along to the radio. To every song that I recognize, I sing. I sing at the top of my lungs, with a voice that could break glass, make every cat within a two mile radius hide under the sofa, and send every person forced to listen into a mild psychiatric stay at a mental ward. Because I sing in my car, does that make me a singer? Right before my 20th Birthday, my boyfriend of three months, ended our relationship. We both knew that it was coming to an end. My mother, being the kind, supportive, and sweet-hearted lady that she is, presented me with a book called “He’s Just Not That Into You”, as a way to sooth my sorrows. I was introduced to phrases like “the only responsibility that you have in someone else’s lapse in judgment…is to yourself”, “you already have an asshole, you don’t need another one”, “life is already hard enough without choosing someone difficult to share it with”, and “don’t be that girl”. My mother’s inclination was correct (I can’t wait until I can torture my own kid!). I was in need of a little reinforcement. I went through a growing pain that many face. All my own values, behaviour, and words said, were justified by the words said in a lime green book. Because I read “He’s Just Not That Into You”, am I a psychologist? Do you see where I’m going with this? OK, here’s another one to consider… I follow along with the stories of the day-to-day. I write about my findings on an internet generated posting service, where my “friends” can read my words, leave comments and write back to me if they so chose. I can write about anything that I want, from how much I hated the shoes of the woman in line in front of me at Pioneer Gas Station, to, how George W. Bush is handling the war. I’m a blogger. Am I journalist? I test myself by answering this question. A blogger is a journalist. Almost immediately, I’m offended. My thoughts are these; “what! They think they can just waltz in here and say they’re journalists because they write on some website about what happened to them that day, they’re opinion, what they had for lunch?”, and “how dare they! They don’t know what it takes to be a journalist, the responsibility of being one, how important it is to see a story from all sides, and who knows if they know how to credit a quote to a person!” To quote Ed The Sock “don’t piss in my ear, and tell me it’s raining”. Don’t just write things, and call it journalism. But how many people really rely on a blogging website to report the facts, accurately, honestly, and with a proper degree of professional writing? When someone wants to know what happened, they pick sources they know they can trust. They scoop up a newspaper from a stand, or they tune into a local radio station. There are reasons for this… To me, a journalist knows the importance of integrity, enthusiasm, patience, respect and have a true love for communicating. They know how to deal with every kind of person; from the overly pompous to the painfully shy, in order to get something they want. They’re master communicators who know how to reach every level of a broad audience with the words that they use to say what they mean. They dig below the top “sugar coated” level of a story, and dig into the gruesomeness that they know will steal the reader’s heart, grab their attention, bring tears to their eyes, or make them smile. A journalist reports what happened and saves their opinion for the “supper table”. They actually sit down, and speak with their sources. They don’t post what they think happened on a website, they know what happened. They don't go by "hear say". Journalists write the truth, and publish it in a honourble, professional, and reliable way. Then, it’s read over by another set of eyes, and then another. That’s journalism. You can’t just start a website, stick a funny name on it, write on it every so often, and call it journalism. To me, this just doesn’t make sense. Perhaps I’m just biased because I’m studying to be a journalist. Perhaps the many things that I have learned, have clouded my mind, to the point where I’m just plain stubborn in my ways, and opinions. But I don’t pretend to be an expert at life because I live by the words said by an elderly man, I don’t pretend I’m Diana Ross because I sing her songs, and I’m certainly not an expert at relationships because I read a book about them. Blogging is fun, creative, sharp, intelligent, and a neat way to communicate with people. But it is not journalism.
Comments
Very interesting! I think you make some good points; however, I think you are trying to differentiate between two very similar things. Your post looks like you are making an argument that the concept of blogging is somehow very different than that of journalism. I would retort that they are one in the same.
Blogging is simply a method of publishing one's written works. Journalism is a discipline of collecting, analyzing, and reporting information.
Journalists can publish in a myriad of different mediums: newspapers, magazines, online periodicals (e.g. blogs), etc. Just like bloggers, journalists exhibit flawed reasoning and judgment all the time. Simply because one is a blogger does not mean that their published work can be easily disregarded as valued input on individual experience. I see journalists publishing biased or inaccurate information all the time.
Isn't journalism simply a record of human experience? If this is true, than what makes the experience of a blogger less deserving of the title journalist?
I think that we should give all writing the same value regardless of its publishing medium. True, one has to consider information sources, biases, etc. when reading an individual’s work; however, this is the case in all reading. Even that of journalists working for firms that have already established themselves as credible sources (e.g. national newspapers, etc.).
Kudos again on a thought provoking article! It's definitely an interesting concept to kick around VOX.
I wasn't trying to say that the written works of a blogger were less deserving than the written works of a journalist. But there is no comparison between the professionalism of a journalist and the professionalism of a blogger. You don't need any post-secondary educatioin to become a blogger. You do need training, to be a journalist. Journalism is a recognized profession.
If journalism is the same as blogging, then why isn't blogging recognized by journalism associations? Why aren't there more written stories about the news on blogging websites? Because, it's not journalism. Blogging is the creative works of a person about subjects of their choice. Journalism is reporting on the news of the day, in an objective, fair way, that tells all sides of the stories, so that the reader can make up their own mind on the issue being written on.
Journalism has a way of having more investigative power when writing a story. When does a blogger ever have that kind of power? When can a blogger sit down with a fire chief, and ask the important questions of a fire. They don't have that power.
But I do appreciate your comment. It opened my eyes, but it didn't change my opinion. I'm sorry if you took from my writing that I was knocking down one of your interests. I'm an aspiring write myself, and I encourage all types of writing.
There are already many that are currently recognized as excellent information sources by members of journalism associations; however, it is still a pretty new medium. It'll take some time for it to find its legs as a medium of choice for journalists.